antiviral and associated therapy - versus antiviral and associated therapy - for COVID 19 hospitalized pdf   xlsx method abbreviations

Outcome Relative effect 95%CI LoD Trt. better when I2 k (RCT/OBS) Bayesian probability Overall ROB Publication bias Degree of certainty Endpoint importance Published MA

efficacy endpoints 00

death D28 0.12 [0.02, 0.62]< 10%1 study (1/-)99.4 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
death or transfer to ICU 1.02 [0.02, 52.72]< 10%1 study (1/-)49.6 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
deaths 0.98 [0.63, 1.53]< 131%10 studies (9/1)52.8 %moderatelow moderatecrucial-
deaths (time to event analysis only) 0.94 [0.51, 1.73]< 10%1 study (1/-)57.9 %NAnot evaluable crucial-
clinical deterioration 1.07 [0.63, 1.82]< 10%1 study (1/-)40.2 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement 1.49 [0.64, 3.48]> 186%3 studies (3/-)82.3 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (14-day) 1.48 [1.05, 2.08]> 10%2 studies (2/-)98.8 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
clinical improvement (7-day) 1.46 [0.95, 2.23]> 10%1 study (1/-)95.8 %NAnot evaluable important-
clinical improvement (time to event analysis only) 1.15 [0.70, 1.87]> 184%3 studies (3/-)70.9 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
hospital discharge 1.08 [0.56, 2.09]> 171%3 studies (2/1)59.1 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
mechanical ventilation 0.53 [0.05, 5.86]< 187%2 studies (2/-)69.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
radiologic improvement (14-day) 2.56 [0.56, 11.82]> 180%2 studies (2/-)88.6 %lownot evaluable highimportant-
radiologic improvement (7-day) 0.42 [0.01, 17.35]> 174%2 studies (2/-)32.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance 1.46 [0.64, 3.33]> 176%4 studies (4/-)81.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance (time to event analysis only) 2.39 [0.79, 7.19]> 177%2 studies (2/-)93.9 %highnot evaluable lowimportant-
viral clearance by day 14 1.10 [0.95, 1.26]> 10%2 studies (2/-)89.5 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
viral clearance by day 7 0.82 [0.28, 2.35]> 158%3 studies (3/-)35.3 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
ICU admission 0.83 [0.34, 2.04]< 174%3 studies (3/-)65.9 %lownot evaluable highnon important-
recovery 2.23 [0.23, 21.31]> 187%2 studies (2/-)75.6 %lownot evaluable highnon important-
severe COVID-19 occurrence 0.30 [0.07, 1.27]< 10%1 study (1/-)94.9 %NAnot evaluable non important-

safety endpoints 00

serious adverse events 0.43 [0.03, 5.81]< 10%2 studies (2/-)73.6 %some concernnot evaluable moderateimportant-
adverse events 0.51 [0.06, 4.06]< 168%4 studies (4/-)73.6 %lownot evaluable highnon important-
serious adverse events (SAE), any 0.50 [0.32, 0.79]< 10%1 study (1/-)99.9 %NAnot evaluable non important-

LoD: level of statistical demonstration: Statistically conclusive: statistically significant with a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error (statistically demonstrated), does not take into account the risk of bias; suggested: nominally statistically significant but without a strict control of overall risk of type 1 error; inconclusive: not nominally statistically significant; safety concerns;
Bayesian probability: Bayesian posterior probability of treatment effect (computed with a noninformative prior); ROB: risk of bias; k: number of studies; published MA: number of published meta-analysis on the same topic; degree of certainty adapted from GRADE. Trt. better when: indicates when the relative treatment effect shows that the studied treatment is better than control.